• Ernie Diaz

Sorry State

Getting a financial firm to give you your money back can be difficult, even when they’re contractually obligated to do so. Thus, Vanguard’s recent return of almost $27 billion, voluntarily, to China state institutions, speaks volumes about the pitfalls of working with government-backed clients.

Whether local Vanguard employees’ patience or livers gave out first, we’ll never know. What is clear is their stated rationale of going after China’s retail investors, citing the move as more profitable. Curious, considering Vanguard’s chief retail offering of micro-fee index investing.

“Vanguard’s opinion underlines our position on China’s investment industry,” says Jimmie Jeremejev, “in that it is vastly underserved. Only 3% penetration, by our partner Raffles’ reckoning.”

More prescience points to Vanguard in betting that China’s main street investors are ready for products which have been extant in the West for years, but denied them thus far. “The same people who believe it’s too early for Chinese index investing are the same people who thought China wasn’t ready for coffee, wine, and the NBA twenty years ago,” Jeremejev jests.

3 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

On The Road Again

Alternative title - "We're not going Huawei." Now that they've been outed as the greatest threat to intergalactic security since the Death Star, Huawei is tending its China gardens, offering self-driv

The Thin Red Lines

This “red line” business is the worst China meme since the West Point-inspired “no excuses” meme of ’05, which led to years of hair salon and restaurant staff lining up on the sidewalk pre-shift for


Some acronyms have more brand equity than Coca-Cola, especially since the Woke-a-Cola scandal. GDP and IPO, in particular, denote abundance and prosperity. The more the better; who wants to be a Bhuta

Contact Us


10-2 Liangmaqiao Diplomatic Compound

No.22 Dongfang East Road Chaoyang District


(86) (10) 8532 1919

Copyright ©2021 LEHMANBUSH