• Ernie Diaz

Another Shein-ing Example

As copyright and trademark protection in China is our bailiwick, we hear familiar bells ringing over Shein's new IP-theft case, this time with Dr. Martens accusing. In 2018, it was Levi's, charging Shein with copying their stitching patterns.

Dr. Marten's parent company AirWair is also charging Shein with copying stitching patterns, and elasticized soles, to boot....literally to boot.

For some context, Shein is a self-styled "H&M killer", in the business of aping more expensive fashions, then distributing them almost exclusively via mobile channels, a Zara-esque iteration profitable enow to see the company through to pre-IPO stage.

"The complaint is a time-honored and legitimate one," opines Edward Lehman. "However, in this post-industrial age, marketing is everything. Airwair claiming substantial damages in China from a copied stitching pattern is rather like an app with 5,000 users claiming that Instagram is using the color scheme it implemented first. In any event, what is clear is that Airwair failed to file and implement proper IP protection in China, an all-too-common mistake. And an especially lamentable one, given that such protection is more streamlined and enforceable than ever."

2 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All

Let's tick off all China's bad news, before getting to the good news. Good news, that is, for investors looking to diversify their global portfolios. Not so good for Gordon Chang and other patient app

Like Hollywood, the western press is invested in narratives and emotional manipulation. Unlike Hollywood, that press has no compunction about skipping the third act of a story, if it doesn't fit that

Politics makes shortchanged bedfellows. As we've written before and will no doubt write again, the paradigm that China stocks = the VIEs of giant tech companies that make it to New York is keeping ave